Is email secure for sending client documents? A portal compared with email.

Updated · Brun is our product; we say where the other option is the better pick.

What standard email encryption actually covers

When people say email is encrypted, they usually mean TLS: the connection between two mail servers is encrypted, like a sealed tube between post offices. Gmail uses it automatically, and Microsoft’s Exchange Online uses it whenever the other side supports it. Microsoft’s own documentation puts the limit plainly: TLS encrypts the connection, not the message.

That leaves three gaps that matter for client documents:

  • The message is readable where it is stored. At each provider, on both ends, and in their backups.
  • Copies multiply. Sent folder, inbox, every synced phone and laptop, every forward and every reply that quotes the original.
  • The weak end is often the client’s. A work account the employer can read, a shared family login, an old password reused elsewhere.

True message-level encryption for email exists (S/MIME, Microsoft Purview Message Encryption, Google’s client-side encryption on certain Workspace editions), but it has to be bought and set up, and it often makes the recipient sign in somewhere to read it. Few small firms and fewer clients run it.

A client portal compared with email

Email details from Google and Microsoft help documentation for standard accounts, checked November 2, 2026.
 Ordinary emailEnd-to-end encrypted portal (Brun)
Encrypted in transitUsually (TLS, when both servers support it)Yes
Readable by the providerYes, on each provider's serversNo. Encrypted on the sender's device; Brun has no key
Copies of the documentEvery mailbox and synced device it reachesOne place, removed when you delete the portal
Attachment size25 MB in Gmail; 20 MB by default in Outlook2 GB per file
Proof the firm received itOnly if someone repliesDelivered, then Opened by name, shown to the client
Signing documentsPrint, sign, scan, email back, or a separate toolBuilt in, on the same page
Everything for one matter in one placeScattered across threadsFiles, signatures, updates and messages together
Client effortNone, everyone has emailOpen a link. No account, no app

When email is fine, and when it isn’t

Email is fine for

  • Scheduling, reminders and logistics.
  • Documents that are already public, like filed pleadings.
  • Telling a client that something is waiting for them somewhere safer.

Use a portal for

  • IDs, bank and tax records, photos and video evidence.
  • Agreements, settlement terms, drafts and advice.
  • Anything from a client writing on a work account or a shared device.

That last column is exactly how Brun uses email: its notices to the client say only that something new is waiting, with a link, and carry nothing from the matter. The content itself stays in the encrypted portal.

What a portal doesn’t fix

A portal protects what is sent through it. If a client also forwards your advice from their own email, or screenshots the page, that copy is outside any system’s control. And Brun isn’t an email replacement for the whole firm: it covers the exchange with clients, not your correspondence with courts, opposing counsel or vendors.

Related: how to send sensitive documents securely, what a privilege email disclaimer does, and secure file sharing for law firms.

Sources (checked November 2, 2026): support.google.com/mail/answer/6330403, /7674059, /13317990, /6584; learn.microsoft.com (Exchange Online TLS; Outlook attachment size limits). Gmail and Outlook are trademarks of their owners.

Questions people ask

Is Gmail or Outlook end-to-end encrypted?

Not by default. Both encrypt the connection between mail servers with TLS when the other side supports it, which protects the message in transit, but the message is readable on each provider's servers. Message-level encryption (S/MIME, Microsoft Purview Message Encryption, Google's client-side encryption) exists on some business plans and needs setup on both ends.

Is Gmail confidential mode secure enough for client documents?

Confidential mode adds an expiry date, an optional passcode and blocks the forward, copy and download buttons. It is an access control, not end-to-end encryption, and the recipient can still take screenshots or photos of the message.

Why not just encrypt the PDF with a password?

That helps for one PDF if the password is strong and sent separately. It doesn't cover photos, videos or the message itself, leaves copies in both mailboxes, and gives no record the client opened it. It also relies on the client managing passwords well.

Will clients actually use a portal instead of email?

They will if it is easier than email. That means opening from a text message, no account or app, accepting photos and big videos straight from the phone, and showing that the firm got what they sent. Clients stop asking 'did you get my email?' when they can see the answer.

Keep reading

Is Email Secure to Send Documents? Client Portal vs Email